⚠ Trading involves significant risk of loss. Everything on this site is for education only and is not financial advice.
Lesson 12 of 12 · Free

A written portfolio-construction document with risk budget, bands, stress-test results and a monitoring dashboard

Assemble the course into a one-document portfolio plan: risk-budget targets, rebalancing bands, concentration caps, stress-test limits and a quarterly dashboard with traffic lights, filled in for a hypothetical portfolio.

Author: Moustafa HijaziContent reviewed: 2026-10-305 min readSelf-study course

What you will learn

  • The seven sections of a portfolio-construction document.
  • How to turn the course's rules into a quarterly dashboard with green, amber and red thresholds.
  • How to run one dashboard update and decide which actions it triggers.
  • How to change the document in a controlled way.

Explanation

A portfolio-construction document is the technical annex to the one-page investment policy from the course "ETFs, Funds & Long-Term Investing". The policy states goals; this document records how the allocation was derived and which numbers trigger action. Write it calm; read it when you are not. Seven sections:

  1. Capital-market assumptions (lesson 3): expected real returns, volatilities and correlations, with date and method.
  2. Risk budget (lesson 1): target weights and target risk contributions per sleeve, plus the correlation regime (lesson 2) the budget assumes.
  3. Drawdown budget and glide path (lessons 5 and 7): maximum acceptable loss in euros and percent, the equity share it implies, and the equity share by age.
  4. Structure (lessons 6, 8, 9): core and satellites with the tracking-error budget, diversifier sleeves with their break-even correlation, and concentration caps including employer stock and sector limits.
  5. Rebalancing rules (lesson 4): band type and width per sleeve, review frequency, order of operations (new savings first, then sales).
  6. Stress-test results (lesson 10): the three scenarios with assumptions and euro results next to their limits, and the leverage rule (lesson 11), normally "none".
  7. Dashboard and change rules: the metrics below, update timing (quarterly plus after any 10 percent market move), and the rule that changes to sections 1–6 need a written reason and a 30-day cooling-off period.

The monitoring dashboard is a short table with three states. Green: inside tolerance, no action. Amber: outside tolerance, act at the next scheduled review or with new savings. Red: outside a hard limit, act within a defined number of trading days. Metrics: weight deviation per sleeve versus band; drawdown versus budget; worst stress-test result versus limit; effective number of holdings; largest position and employer stock versus caps; satellite tracking error; leverage; costs.

Red should be rare. If the dashboard turns red every quarter, the bands or the risk budget are wrong; that is a design change with a cooling-off period, not a reason to trade.

Worked example

Hypothetical example: targets 60 percent global equities, 25 percent euro government bonds, 5 percent gold, 10 percent cash; absolute bands ±5 points for equities and bonds, ±2 for gold and cash; drawdown budget 25 percent (amber at −15); stress limit 25 percent (amber at −22); no single stocks or leverage. Peak value €345,000. Fees and taxes excluded.

Quarter-end: equities €212,000, bonds €72,000, gold €17,000, cash €29,000; total €330,000.

Metric Value Target / limit State Action
Equity weight 212,000 / 330,000 = 64.2 % 60 % ± 5 Green (+4.2) New savings to bonds
Bond weight 21.8 % 25 % ± 5 Green (−3.2) Buy with new savings
Gold weight 5.2 % 5 % ± 2 Green None
Cash weight 8.8 % 10 % ± 2 Green (−1.2) None
Drawdown (330,000 − 345,000) / 345,000 = −4.3 % −25 % Green None
Worst stress test (equity −35 %, bonds +5 %) −0.642 × 35 + 0.218 × 5 = −21.4 % −25 % Green, near amber Watch

Decision: nothing is amber or red, so no trades; new contributions go to bonds until the equity deviation is under 2 points. The stress line is "watch": if equities reach 66 percent with bonds near 20 percent, the worst case is about −22.1 percent, the line turns amber and the investor rebalances at the next review although the ±5 band would still permit 65 percent.

Cooling-off example: after a strong year the investor wants an equity target of 70 percent. The document requires a written reason, a recomputed stress test (−0.70 × 35 + 0.15 × 5 = −23.8 percent, inside 25) and 30 days; often the reason no longer reads well by then.

Common mistake

A dashboard that only tracks performanceReturn versus a benchmark is the one number this dashboard does not need: it is noisy, invites reactions, and is already in your broker's app. Monitor the risk inputs you control: weights, concentration, drawdown, stress results, costs. If every review starts with "how did I do?", the next step is usually a change the risk budget never asked for.

Practice activity

On paper: targets 50 percent equities, 30 percent bonds, 10 percent gold, 10 percent cash; bands ±5, ±5, ±3, ±3 points; drawdown budget 20 percent (amber at −12); stress limit 20 percent (equity −35 percent, bonds +5, gold +5). Peak €260,000. Quarter-end: equities €128,000, bonds €62,000, gold €26,000, cash €14,000. Fill in weights, drawdown and worst stress test, and state the actions.

Show solution

Total €230,000. Equities 55.7 percent (+5.7, outside ±5: rebalance), bonds 27.0 percent (−3.0, green), gold 11.3 percent (+1.3, green), cash 6.1 percent (−3.9, outside ±3: rebalance).

Drawdown = (230,000 − 260,000) / 260,000 = −11.5 percent: green, 0.5 points from amber.

Worst stress test = −0.557 × 35 + 0.270 × 5 + 0.113 × 5 = −19.5 + 1.35 + 0.57 = −17.6 percent: inside the 20 percent limit.

Actions: sell €13,000 of equities (to €115,000 = 50 percent) and move the proceeds to cash (€27,000 ≈ 11.7 percent, inside band); record the trade and the reason (band breach, not a market view).

Limitations: ignores taxes and costs of the sale.

Key takeaways

  • The construction document records how the allocation was derived and which numbers trigger action.
  • A dashboard of risk metrics with green, amber and red thresholds replaces performance-watching with rule-following.
  • When two rules differ, the stricter threshold applies.
  • Target changes need a written reason, a recomputed stress test and a cooling-off period; red every quarter means the design needs fixing.

Next step

This completes the course; continue with "Reading Economic Data Releases" to learn how inflation, labour and growth data are produced and how markets react.

Self-check

Answer the questions, then check your answers. You can retry as often as you like.

1. Target equity weight 60 percent with a ±5-point absolute band, but the stress-test limit turns amber once the equity weight passes 62 percent. The portfolio drifts to 63 percent. What does the document require?

2. Hypothetical: targets 55 percent equities, 35 percent bonds, 10 percent cash. Quarter-end values €165,000, €84,000, €51,000. Which sleeve breaches a ±5-point absolute band?

3. Why does the lesson recommend leaving benchmark-relative performance off the monitoring dashboard?

Automatic self-check for your own revision. Your answers are checked in your browser and are not seen or assessed by us. It is not an exam and not a qualification.

Your progress

“Complete” only means you marked the lesson as done. It is not a test of your understanding. Progress and notes are saved only in this browser on this device — not in an account.