How Indices Are Built: Market-Cap Weighting, MSCI World, FTSE All-World, S&P 500 and Concentration
Calculate free-float market-cap weights, compare the major equity indices behind popular ETFs, and measure how concentrated an index really is.
What you will learn
- The building blocks of an index rulebook: universe, selection, weighting and review.
- How to calculate free-float market-cap weights step by step.
- The key differences between MSCI World, FTSE All-World and S&P 500.
- How to measure concentration with the "effective number of stocks".
Explanation
What an index is and how exchanges publish them was introduced in the course "Stocks & Fundamental Analysis". Here we look at the rulebook, because an ETF can only be as good as the index it follows. Every index provider publishes a methodology with four parts:
- Universe: which countries, exchanges and security types are eligible.
- Selection: size, liquidity and sometimes profitability filters.
- Weighting: how much each company counts.
- Review: how often the list and weights are updated. Changes at reviews create turnover inside the fund.
Most broad indices use free-float market-cap weighting. Market capitalisation (market cap) = share price × number of shares. The free-float factor is the share of stock that can actually be traded, excluding for example large founder or state holdings. The weight of company i is:
weight_i = free-float market cap_i ÷ sum of all free-float market caps
Advantages: low turnover (weights move with prices automatically) and the index mirrors the investable market. Disadvantage: companies that have risen strongly get larger weights, so the index can become concentrated. Alternatives are equal weighting (every stock the same weight, regular rebalancing needed), price weighting (used by the Dow Jones Industrial Average) and factor indices.
The three most-used equity indices for ETF investors (figures change; check the current factsheet):
| Index | Universe | Size | Selection |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSCI World | 23 developed countries, no emerging markets | About 1,250 large and mid caps; aims to cover about 85% of free-float market cap in each country | Rules-based |
| FTSE All-World | More than 45 developed and emerging countries | About 4,200 large and mid caps | Rules-based |
| S&P 500 | US companies only | 500 companies (slightly over 500 share lines) | A committee decides; new members need, among other things, positive earnings |
A "world" index is not geographically equal. According to MSCI's factsheet of 30 September 2026, the United States made up about 73% of the MSCI World and the ten largest companies about 28%. Small and micro caps are not included in any of the three; they are covered by separate "small cap" or "IMI" (investable market index) versions.
To measure concentration, use the effective number of stocks: N_eff = 1 ÷ (sum of squared weights). An index of 4 equal stocks has N_eff = 4. If one stock dominates, N_eff falls towards 1, even though the index still "holds" many names.
Worked example
Hypothetical example: a mini index with four companies. Prices in euros, shares in billions. Costs are not relevant here.
| Company | Price | Shares | Market cap | Free float | Free-float cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | €200 | 1.0 | €200bn | 100% | €200bn |
| B | €50 | 2.0 | €100bn | 50% | €50bn |
| C | €40 | 1.5 | €60bn | 80% | €48bn |
| D | €10 | 3.0 | €30bn | 100% | €30bn |
- Total free-float cap = €200 + €50 + €48 + €30 = €328bn.
- Weights: A = 200 ÷ 328 ≈ 60.98%; B = 50 ÷ 328 ≈ 15.24%; C = 48 ÷ 328 ≈ 14.63%; D = 30 ÷ 328 ≈ 9.15%.
- N_eff = 1 ÷ (0.6098² + 0.1524² + 0.1463² + 0.0915²) ≈ 1 ÷ 0.4248 ≈ 2.35. Four names, but the risk behaves like about 2.4 equal stocks.
- Suppose over one year A returns +10%, B −5%, C +2%, D +20%. Cap-weighted return ≈ 0.6098 × 10% + 0.1524 × (−5%) + 0.1463 × 2% + 0.0915 × 20% ≈ +7.46%. Equal-weighted return = (10 − 5 + 2 + 20) ÷ 4 = +6.75%.
The single large company A drives most of the result. That is concentration in practice.
Common mistake
Practice activity
On paper: an index has three companies. X has a market cap of €300bn and 100% free float; Y has €150bn and 60% free float; Z has €60bn and 100% free float.
- Calculate each free-float weight.
- Calculate the effective number of stocks.
Show solution
1. Free-float caps: X €300bn, Y €150bn × 0.6 = €90bn, Z €60bn. Total €450bn. Weights: X ≈ 66.67%, Y = 20.00%, Z ≈ 13.33%.
2. Sum of squares = 0.4444 + 0.0400 + 0.0178 ≈ 0.5022. N_eff ≈ 1 ÷ 0.5022 ≈ 1.99. The index behaves like about two equal stocks.
Limitations: N_eff ignores correlation; ten stocks from the same sector can still move together.
Key takeaways
- An index is a rulebook: universe, selection, weighting and review.
- Free-float market-cap weight = a company's free-float cap ÷ the total; large winners automatically gain weight.
- MSCI World covers developed markets only, FTSE All-World adds emerging markets, S&P 500 is US only and committee-selected.
- Use the factsheet and N_eff = 1 ÷ Σ(weight²) to see real concentration.
Next step
In the next lesson you will see how an ETF actually tracks its index, physically or synthetically, and what happens to dividends.
Self-check
Answer the questions, then check your answers. You can retry as often as you like.
Automatic self-check for your own revision. Your answers are checked in your browser and are not seen or assessed by us. It is not an exam and not a qualification.
Your progress
“Complete” only means you marked the lesson as done. It is not a test of your understanding. Progress and notes are saved only in this browser on this device — not in an account.