⚠ Trading involves significant risk of loss. Everything on this site is for education only and is not financial advice.
Lesson 4 of 12 · Free

Best-in-Class, Tilting and Climate Benchmarks: ESG Leaders, SRI, Paris-Aligned and Climate Transition Rules

Compare the construction rules of MSCI ESG Leaders and SRI indices with the EU Paris-Aligned and Climate Transition Benchmarks, and calculate a decarbonisation trajectory.

Author: Moustafa HijaziContent reviewed: 2026-10-305 min readSelf-study course

What you will learn

  • How best-in-class selection (ESG Leaders, SRI) keeps a fixed share of each sector.
  • What ESG tilting does differently from selection.
  • The minimum rules of EU Climate Transition Benchmarks (CTB) and Paris-Aligned Benchmarks (PAB).
  • How to calculate weighted average carbon intensity and a 7% yearly decarbonisation path.

Explanation

Lesson 3 removed companies. This lesson covers methods that select or re-weight them, and the EU's two regulated climate index types. Market-cap weighting itself is covered in the course "ETFs, Funds & Long-Term Investing".

Best-in-class selection

A best-in-class index keeps the highest-rated companies in each sector until a target share of the sector's market capitalisation is reached, so the sector mix stays close to the parent: a best-in-class world index still contains energy and materials, just the better-rated names. MSCI publishes two families (rules per methodology documents from around 2021–2022; check the current version):

Index family Sector coverage target Minimum rating (new entrants) Exclusions
MSCI ESG Leaders 50% of each sector's free-float market cap BB, controversy score 3 or more Short list (controversial weapons, tobacco, thermal coal, oil sands and similar)
MSCI SRI 25% of each sector A, controversy score 4 or more Long list with 5% thresholds (lesson 1 and 3)

The 25% target makes SRI indices far more concentrated than their parents; buffer rules for existing members reduce turnover.

Tilting

A tilted index keeps (almost) all companies but changes their weights: higher-rated or lower-carbon companies are over-weighted, others under-weighted, usually with a cap on how far any weight can move. Tilting gives lower tracking error than selection but a smaller ESG improvement; many "ESG Enhanced" indices work this way.

EU Climate Transition and Paris-Aligned Benchmarks

The EU Benchmark Regulation created two protected labels, detailed in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818. An index may only call itself "EU CTB" or "EU PAB" if it meets minimum standards:

  • Carbon intensity reduction versus the investable universe: at least 30% for a CTB and 50% for a PAB, measured on Scope 1, 2 and (phased in) Scope 3 greenhouse-gas emissions.
  • Self-decarbonisation: the index's carbon intensity must fall by at least 7% per year on average.
  • No escape into low-carbon sectors: the index must keep at least the same exposure to high-climate-impact sectors as its universe.
  • Exclusions: both exclude controversial weapons, tobacco and UNGC/OECD violators. A PAB additionally excludes revenue of 1% or more from hard coal or lignite, 10% or more from oil fuels, 50% or more from gaseous fuels, and 50% or more from electricity above 100 g CO2e/kWh.

Hence a CTB can hold oil and gas producers while a PAB largely cannot. Intensity is measured as a weighted average carbon intensity: WACI = Σ (weight × emissions per € million of revenue or enterprise value, depending on the methodology).

Worked example

Hypothetical example: an invented investable universe with six sector blocks. Carbon intensity is given in tonnes CO2e per € million revenue.

Sector Weight Intensity Weight × intensity
Energy 10% 600 60.0
Utilities 5% 800 40.0
Industrials 15% 200 30.0
Technology 30% 30 9.0
Financials 20% 20 4.0
Other 20% 120 24.0

Step 1 – universe WACI = 60 + 40 + 30 + 9 + 4 + 24 = 167 t CO2e per € million.

Step 2 – maximum starting intensity: CTB = 167 × 0.70 = 116.9; PAB = 167 × 0.50 = 83.5.

Step 3 – trajectory for the PAB: 7% per year compound. After five years: 83.5 × 0.93⁵ = 83.5 × 0.6957 = 58.1. After ten years: 83.5 × 0.93¹⁰ = 83.5 × 0.4840 = 40.4.

Step 4 – the sector rule: the index may not drop Energy and Utilities to zero; it must keep the universe's exposure to high-impact sectors and instead pick lower-intensity names within them.

Assumptions: Scope 3 ignored, no data gaps, no enterprise-value adjustment; administrators publish the exact formula.

Common mistake

Believing a climate benchmark is a fossil-free fundA CTB index must keep its exposure to high-impact sectors and only excludes weapons, tobacco and norm violators, so it can hold oil majors. Even a PAB can hold a gas company below 50% gas revenue or a utility just under the 100 g/kWh rule. "Paris-aligned" is a rule about index-level intensity and a trajectory, not a promise that every holding is clean.

Practice activity

On paper: a universe has WACI 240 t CO2e per € million. (a) What is the maximum starting WACI for a CTB and for a PAB? (b) What must the PAB's WACI be after three years of the required trajectory? (c) A sector in the parent index has five companies with weights 30%, 25%, 20%, 15% and 10% and ratings AAA, BB, A, B and AA. For an ESG Leaders-style selection (50% coverage target, pick by rating from the top), which companies are selected?

Show solution

(a) CTB: 240 × 0.70 = 168. PAB: 240 × 0.50 = 120.

(b) 120 × 0.93³ = 120 × 0.8044 = 96.5.

(c) Order by rating: AAA (30%), AA (10%), A (20%), BB (25%), B (15%). Cumulative: 30% → 40% → 60%. The 50% target is reached after adding the A company (60% is the smallest total at or above 50%), so AAA, AA and A are selected; BB and B are not.

Limitations: real methodologies use buffers, minimum-size rules and controversy scores, so a company's selection can differ from this pure ranking.

Key takeaways

  • Best-in-class keeps the top-rated part of each sector (Leaders about 50%, SRI about 25%); tilting re-weights instead of removing.
  • CTB: at least 30% lower intensity; PAB: at least 50% lower; both must decarbonise 7% a year and keep high-impact sector exposure.
  • Only the PAB carries strict fossil-fuel revenue exclusions (1% coal, 10% oil, 50% gas, 50% high-carbon power).
  • WACI = Σ weight × intensity; a 7% path means roughly 30% lower after five years and 52% lower after ten.

Next step

Next you will learn what the EU's SFDR Article 6, 8 and 9 labels do and do not mean, how principal adverse impact indicators are calculated and which words a fund may carry in its name.

Self-check

Answer the questions, then check your answers. You can retry as often as you like.

1. A universe has a weighted average carbon intensity of 300 t CO2e per € million. What is the maximum starting intensity for an index that wants to be an EU Paris-Aligned Benchmark?

2. Which company could be held by an EU Climate Transition Benchmark but not by an EU Paris-Aligned Benchmark?

3. How does an MSCI SRI index differ from an MSCI ESG Leaders index in construction?

Automatic self-check for your own revision. Your answers are checked in your browser and are not seen or assessed by us. It is not an exam and not a qualification.

Your progress

“Complete” only means you marked the lesson as done. It is not a test of your understanding. Progress and notes are saved only in this browser on this device — not in an account.